C4D Network

Global community of professionals working in Communication for Development

Advanced Search
  • Home
    • About Us
  • News & Events
    • Newsfeed
    • Events
    • Opportunities
  • Network Community
    • Members
    • Country Chapters
  • Learning
    • C4D Know-How
    • C4D in Action
    • Learning Resources
    • C4D Development Topics
  • Recruitment
  • Support & Services
    • Consultancy
    • Service Providers

Whose Justice, Whose Alternative? Locating women’s voice and agency in alternative dispute resolution responses to intimate partner violence (Beyond Borders, Center for Domestic Violence Prevention (CEDOVIP), and ICRW report, 2016)

April 25, 2019

Intimate partner violence against women is a complex, enormously prevalent crime with devastating effects on women’s safety, health, and well being. With one out of three women worldwide experiencing this violence, its magnitude presents complex challenges to justice systems when survivors of violence seek to formally prosecute perpetrators. Further exacerbating this challenge are the varying individual, family, and community ideas about whether and how such violence – considered a private family matter in many cultural and social contexts – should be made public at all, let alone prosecuted.

Feminist activists insist on a core ethical standard that women survivors of intimate partner violence determine their own course of action in response to violence. But significant obstacles exist in every direction survivors of intimate partner violence may turn.

Both anecdotal and empirical evidence suggests that, in the face of these obstacles, a significant proportion of women survivors of intimate partner violence choose community-based alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms to help address the violence they are facing. Research finds that as many as 80 percent of disputes made public in the Global South are addressed through the informal justice system.

This report examines how well ADR mechanisms have addressed violence for women around the world by examining the following:

  • What do ADR responses to intimate partner violence look like, particularly in the Global South?
  • To what extent do these approaches prioritize the voice and agency of women survivors of intimate partner violence?
  •  What examples exist of ADR approaches that better prioritize the voice and agency of women survivors of intimate partner violence?

Click here for full report.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Filed Under: *INTER-PERSONAL ROUTES, Advocacy, Peace & Social Cohesion, Publications (published in print and/or online), Violence against Women & Children (VAWC), Voice and Accountability Tagged With: Feminism, Intimate Partner Violence (IPV), Justice

Site Navigation

Join C4D
Contact Us
Get Involved
Facebook Group
LinkedIn Group

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Social Networks

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Communication for Development Network
Registered address:
Finsbury House, New Street,
Chipping Norton, Oxon, OX7 5LL, UK
E-mail [email protected]
Non-profit Company Number: 7734410

Privacy Policy

Cookie Policy

Copyright © 2023 C4D Network · Website by IndigoBird